MauiLifeStyleBlog

If your property is listed in Hawaii, please read and BEWARE that there are some websites out there by illegitimate entities that propose to help you

NARRATIVE SUMMARY

AND

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

REGARDING

ACT 137 – MORTGAGE RESCUE FRAUD PREVENTION ACT

[Wayne M. Pitluck, General Counsel]

9/16/08

Printable Version (PDF)

INTRODUCTION

Act 137, the Mortgage Rescue Fraud Prevention Act (“the Act”), was passed by the legislature this past session, and signed into law by the Governor on June 3, 2008.  The purpose of the Act was “to protect Hawaii consumers from persons who prey on homeowners who face property foreclosures, liens, or encumbrances.”

The Act seeks to fulfill its purpose by:   (1) establishing definitions for a new and special kind of residential real estate transaction to be called a “Distressed Property Conveyance”, and (2) establishing notice and disclosure obligations and other restrictions on all such transactions.  Although the purpose of the Act was clearly to address scams and fraudulent schemes by persons with a criminal intent, the broad language of the Act cuts across a large number of legitimate transactions in the current market.

For that reason, it is essential that every real estate licensee familiarize himself or herself with the Act, and that every Brokerage Firm develop a clear policy for dealing with the Act, and provide education for their associates.  HAR is providing this narrative summary and list of FAQs to assist in that regard.  However, every Brokerage Firm is strongly advised to seek Hawaii legal counsel to advise how best to reduce the risk of violation of the Act.

[IMPORTANT NOTE:  This Narrative Summary and Frequently Asked Questions replaces any and all information related to Act 137 previously published on this web site, with the exception of the newly published Distressed Property addenda and the introductory notice published with such forms.  All such previously published information should be disregarded.  Similarly, any publications of NAR or any other mainland resource dealing with either short sales or distressed property transactions should not be used without consulting with Hawaii legal counsel, due to the fact that such publications may not be in compliance with Act 137.]

THE ACT

The New Defined Terms

The Act defines new and important terms, without knowledge of which, one cannot hope to interpret the Act:

The term “Distressed Property” is defined as any residential real property that:

1. Is in foreclosure or at risk of foreclosure because payment of any loan that is secured by the residential real property is more than sixty days delinquent;
2. Had a lien or encumbrance charged against it because of nonpayment of any taxes, lease assessments, association fees, or maintenance fees;
3. Is at risk of having a lien or encumbrance charged against it because the payment of any taxes, lease assessments, association fees, or maintenance fees are more than ninety days delinquent;
4. Secures a loan for which a notice of default has been given; or
5. Secures a loan that has been accelerated.

The term “Distressed Property Consultant” is defined as any person who performs or makes any solicitation, representation, or offer to perform any of the following relating to a Distressed Property:

1. Stop or postpone the foreclosure sale or loss of any Distressed Property due to the nonpayment of any loan that is secured by the Distressed Property;
2. Stop or postpone the charging of any lien or encumbrance against any Distressed Property or eliminate any lien or encumbrance charged against any Distressed Property for the nonpayment of any taxes, lease assessments, association fees, or maintenance fees;
3. Obtain any forbearance from any beneficiary or mortgagee, or relief with respect to a tax sale of the Distressed Property;
4. Assist the owner to exercise any cure of default arising under Hawaii law;
5. Obtain any extension of the period within which the owner may reinstate the owner's rights with respect to the Distressed Property;
6. Obtain any waiver of an acceleration clause contained in any promissory note or contract secured by a mortgage on a Distressed Property or contained in the mortgage;
7. Assist the owner in foreclosure, loan default, or post-tax sale redemption period to obtain a loan or advance of funds;
8. Avoid or ameliorate the impairment of the owner's credit resulting from the recording or filing of a notice of default or the conduct of a foreclosure sale or tax sale; or
9. Save the owner's residence from foreclosure or loss of home due to nonpayment of taxes.

The term “Distressed Property Consultant Contract” is defined as any agreement or obligation between an owner or agent of an owner of a Distressed Property and a Distressed Property Consultant.

The term “Distressed Property Conveyance” is defined as the transfer of any interest in a Distressed Property effected directly or indirectly by or through a Distressed Property Consultant.

The term “Distressed Property Conveyance Contract” is defined as any agreement or obligation affecting a Distressed Property Conveyance.

The term “Distressed Property Purchaser” is defined as any person who acquires any interest in a Distressed Property directly or indirectly through a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract.

What The Act Does

Although it is always a risk to try to summarize a statute as comprehensive and complex as this, it is safe to say that the major focus of the Act is to protect owners of Distressed Property.  In very general terms, the Act does this by requiring the following:

1. Whenever a residential real estate transaction involves a Distressed Property, as defined by the Act, any person providing any of the services described with respect to assisting the owner with any foreclosure, liens or encumbrances on the property will be considered to be a Distressed Property Consultant.  A Distressed Property Consultant cannot provide such services without entering into a separate Distressed Property Consultant Contract with the seller, the specific terms and conditions of which are set forth in the Act.  Thus, it is no longer possible for a real estate licensee (or anyone else, for that matter, unless they are specifically exempted from the Act) to assist or even coach an owner of Distressed Property with regard to lien holders, without entering into a Distressed Property Consultant Contract, which specifically defines notices that must be given, obligations and restrictions placed upon services to be rendered, and a limitation on the charges that can be made for such services.
2. Whenever a residential real estate transaction involves a Distressed Property and services provided by a Distressed Property Consultant, the transaction can only be completed using a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract, the specific terms and conditions of which are set forth in the Act.  Such specific terms and conditions include, among other things, requirements of notice, disclosures, limitations on services, and rights of cancellation.  Thus, whenever there is a Distressed Property Conveyance, any Purchase Contract then existing must be amended or replaced with a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract, or the transaction is null and void.
3. None of the provisions of the Act may be waived by the property owner.
4. Any person violating the Act shall be deemed to have engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice within the meaning of Section 480-2, Hawaii Revised Statutes, thereby subjecting the person to government prosecution and private civil actions for treble damages and attorneys' fees.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does the Act affect a real estate licensee?  A real estate licensee becomes affected by the Act if, at any time during the course of engaging in the marketing for, solicitation of, or the providing of services for, a residential real estate transaction, the property becomes a Distressed Property under the Act.  If that occurs, the licensee cannot perform any services related to dealing with, or coaching the owner to deal with, lien holders without entering into, and abiding by, a Distressed Property Consultant Contract.  In addition, if there is both a Distressed Property and services provided by a Distressed Property Consultant, there cannot be a conveyance of the property without a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract, the terms and conditions of which are specified by the Act.
2. How does a Brokerage Firm protect itself from inadvertently violating the Act?  You should consult with legal counsel and develop a policy to deal with this issue.  Any such policy should include (1) requiring the owner client to notify the Brokerage Firm immediately if their property becomes a Distressed Property under the Act; and (2) a determination of whether licensees associated with the Brokerage Firm are permitted to perform services of a Distressed Property Consultant.  Should the Brokerage Firm's policy not allow performance of such services, addenda to the Exclusive Right-To-Sell Listing Agreement and the Purchase Contract should be used to establish an agreement with the property owner recognizing that such services will not be provided.  [NOTE:  HAR has developed, and just published, Standard Form addenda for this purpose.]  Should the Brokerage Firm consider adopting a policy to allow such services to be performed by their associated licensees, the Brokerage Firm is strongly advised to consider all legal implications of such a policy, and only put  the policy in place with the advice of Hawaii legal counsel.  Adoption of such a policy will necessitate the development by the Brokerage Firm of a Distressed Property Consultant Contract, a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract, and policies and other forms connected therewith.
3. Does every residential sale transaction involving a Distressed Property require a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract?  According to the language of the Act, a Distressed Property Conveyance requiring a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract only exists where there is a Distressed Property and someone (the real estate licensee or anyone else) is providing the services of a Distressed Property Consultant.  Thus, if there is a Distressed Property, but no Distressed Property Consultant, there is no need for a Distressed Property Conveyance Contract.
4. Should a Brokerage Firm put a Distressed Property Addendum on every Exclusive Right-To Sell Listing Agreement?  That is a matter for determination by the Brokerage Firm.  Such a policy might be governed, in part, by a determination that a property being listed with no liens or encumbrances or only small liens or encumbrances may not be subject to becoming a Distressed Property.  However, the Brokerage Firm should be aware that a Distressed Property can be created if the Property is at risk of having a lien or encumbrance charged against it because the payment of any taxes, lease assessments, association fees, or maintenance fees are more than 90 days delinquent, even if such charges are in dispute.
5. Are all short sale transactions subject to the Act?  No.  The Act only covers those short sale transactions which involve a property which falls within the definition of a Distressed Property under the Act.
6. Are there any services that a Brokerage Firm can perform to help a seller of a Distressed Property with his or her lien holders?  Any services of any kind which would involve communication with the lien holder can arguably fall within the Act.  In addition, the language of the Act is so broad as to prevent any advice or “coaching” for a seller of a Distressed Property who wants to personally deal with the lien holder.

link to the FULL Act 137 

http://www.hawaiirealtors.com/download/GM779.pdf

By HARRY EAGAR, Staff Writer, Maui News      POSTED: October 10, 2008

WAILUKU - It might be hard to persuade anyone that there is a national housing meltdown when the Multiple Listing Service offers deals on Maui like this:

"Two bedroom, 1 bath older home on a small lot that is zoned industrial - access to property is by footpath only. Being sold as-is - fixer upper. $200,000."

The aggregate statistics for the third-quarter of 2008 released by the Realtors Association of Maui on Thursday also do not portray a cratering housing market.

True, the number of transactions for the first nine months of the year is down by about one quarter, but prices received for houses and condominiums that do sell are holding up.

For single-family houses, the median price this year is $594,500. That is down $44,000 from last year, but is only a 7 percent decline, compared to hard-hit areas of the Mainland where prices are down 15 percent, 20 percent and in some neighborhoods much more.

Average prices for single-family properties are down by the same percentage, but since Maui's average was so high last year, $945,000, the fall as measured in dollars is $70,000, down to $876,615.

Condos averaged $783,000 last year and are up 21 percent to $947,000 this year, but thousands of Maui condos are not in the million-dollar class.

The biggest concentration of middle-class condos is in Kihei, where the average is up 9 percent this year to $493,000.

The median for condo units, the point where half sold for more, half for less, is up 7 percent, to $570,000 countywide, although only 5 percent to $415,000 in Kihei.

The most expensive condos are in Wailea-Makena, averaging $2,184,013 this year, which is up an impressive 37 percent, but that may reflect the late recording of sales contracts that were inked for new construction years ago.

Still, there is little sign that the South Maui luxury condo market is swooning. The number closing this year is 160, only 16 fewer than in the first three quarters of 2007.

As a resort, Wailea is an outlier, commanding room rates almost a third higher than any other luxury resort in the state. It may be an outlier in luxury condominiums as well.

The average condo sales price in Kaanapali this year is off 18 percent to $1,164,364, and the average in Kapalua is down 30 percent to $1,070,794.

In Kaanapali, the number of closings has fallen from 45 to 33, and at Kapalua from 27 to 17.

Lanai is also a market unto itself, where there were only two transactions, but for nearly $2 million on average.

Although prices received are waffling around what sellers received last year (which was down from 2006), the smaller number of transactions means the aggregate value of the turnovers is well down.

The total of condo transactions this year (672 closings compared with 916 at this point last year) is down by $80 million to $637 million.

The number of single-family closings is down from 893 a year ago to 706, and the aggregate transactions are off $226 million to $619 million.

Notice that the number of single-family closings topped the number of condo closings. That is a dramatic change from any year before 2006 when the number of condo sales was often nearly double the number of single-family sales.

The number of days on market is also down sharply from last year. In 2007, it ranged between 74 and 131 for single-family and between 73 and 115 days for condos.

This year, the wait has been between 57 and 95 days for house sellers, 48 and 95 days for condo sellers.

Terry Tolman, the Chief Staff Executive of the Maui Board of Realtors’ association said that the drop in days on market shows that "properties priced right will sell in a reasonable time frame."

He also noted that the number of active listings "has grown considerably in the last 12 months," though the rise has leveled off recently.

Active condo listings this month are up to 1,600, compared with 1,283 in October 2007. Active single-family listings are 1,114, up from 1,016 a year before.

Tolman said median prices in September were down across the board, which might be because buyers are now not able to qualify for as much or because sellers are willing to accept lower offers.